Intelligence
P50 and P80 finish dates, with the drivers called out by name
AI-predicted completion windows for the project and every milestone, plus the quantified gap between the contractor’s stated plan and what the data actually predicts. With the activities, change requests, and risks pushing the date.
- P50 and P80 forecasts for project completion and every milestone
- Stated plan vs. data-driven prediction, the gap, in days
- Driver attribution: which activities, RFIs, change requests, and risks are moving the date
Common use cases
- Brief executives on a forecast finish, not a contractor-stated finish.
- Defend or challenge a recovery schedule with predicted vs. claimed dates.
- Roll forecasts up across a portfolio for owners and PMO consultancies.
Why it matters
Owners want truth. Contractors want to defend their dates. A forecast with named drivers gives both sides something grounded in the record to argue over.
- Replace optimism with evidence, at the activity and milestone level.
- Quantify the gap before it becomes a claim.
- Show motion across versions, not just current state.